.Google.com's Martin Splitt addressed a question in the SEO Workplace Hrs podcast about whether reproducing YouTube video recording information into content on a websites would be seen as duplicate material as well as possess a bad influence on the website rankings.Although reproduce material is actually certainly not a negative ranking element, web content posted on an extra authoritative site can easily cause the material on the much less reliable web site to be outranked. It is actually a valid question to talk to considering that information on an authoritative will definitely out perform the same web content on a less reliable one.Some in the hunt neighborhood refer to one part of information usurping the ranks of yet another as 'cannibalization' of the page's ranking ability. This is actually the problem of the individual requesting the question.Google.com's Martin Splitt portrayed the sent inquiry:." If I produce a YouTube video clip and then take that particular message or information and also area it on a website, could Google flag that website page or even website for duplicate content?".Various Material Media Are Actually Managed As Different.Martin Splitt addressed that the 2 kinds of content are actually various and are going to certainly not be dealt with as the exact same information, thereby publishing message web content drawn out coming from a video is going to not be considered reproduce content.This is his answer:." No, one is actually a video recording and also the various other one is message material, which will be distinct content!".Posting Drew Out Text From Online Video.Martin complimented the tip of drawing out text web content from an online video and also publishing it as text message, keeping in mind that some individuals prefer to take in content in text form as opposed to checking out an online video. Reversing the flow of material coming from message to sound or video clip is actually most likely not a bad concept also because some individuals possess issue reading text message material and also might favor listening to it coming from an online video or a podcast layout.Martin talked about printing video clip material in a textual version:." It is actually also not a bad suggestion, some customers (like me) could prefer a content version and others might certainly not have the capacity to use a video variation of the information to begin with as a result of bandwidth or even aesthetic constraints.".Takeaways.The suggestion behind the concern is repurposing material as well as it's an excellent concept. Explore is greater than Google, it's also YouTube and everywhere people receive their audio content, like Spotify. The truth that there is actually no cannibalization of the web content in between channels creates repurposing a practical technique to stretching your content scope.Listen to the podcast at the 8:20 min score:.Featured Graphic through Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.